Advertisement
  • National News
  • State News
  • Contact Us
Subscribe for $2.50/month
Print Editions
Pocahontas Times
  • News Sections
    • Local
    • Sports
    • A&E
  • Obituaries
  • Community
  • Magistrate News
    • Circuit Court News
  • Compass
  • Spiritual
    • Parabola
    • Transcendental Meditation
    • Diocese of Wheeling-Charleston
    • Southern Baptist
  • Pocahontas County Veterans
  • etimes
  • Classifieds
  • Login
  • FAQ
No Result
View All Result
Pocahontas Times
No Result
View All Result
Print Editions
Pocahontas Times
No Result
View All Result

Letter to the Editor

April 14, 2021
in Letters to the Editor
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Dear Editor;

In late March/early April of last year, as the COVID virus was spreading across the country and the state, Michael Vance as Mayor brought to the attention of Town Council that the State Department of Transportation was intending to allow a Charleston contractor to come to Durbin for the bridge demolition.

It was odd as that bridge has been closed for five (?) years.  Upon investigation, it was discovered that the State was just trying to give work to its contractors in “out of the way places.”  What that meant was places where not a lot of people would see them working.  Also, it was discovered that the contractor would bring employees from the Charleston area and subcontractors from three other states into Durbin in the middle of the pandemic. 

The Mayor and Town Council felt it was in the best interests of the residents of the Town to stop all of these people coming into Durbin and bringing COVID with them. COVID spread through this country by just such means – people traveling from other states and other parts of states and infecting people wherever they went.  In order to protect the residents of Durbin, the Town Government (the Mayor and Town Council) voted to close the Town, as best they could from outsiders.  The Town was able to shut down the bridge project and stop all of those people from coming in from distant places. 

The Town Government did believe that the campground in the middle of Town was the same.   Yes, there was a dispute between the state regulations and the local regulation.  But, the sole purpose of the regulation was to protect the health, safety and welfare of one of the oldest (per capita) communities, in one of the oldest (per capita) counties in one of the oldest (per capita) states in the Union from a disease that most viciously attacked older people. 

Public service is never easy.  But it is easy for people to second guess decisions much later.  At least characterize the motivation of Durbin Town Government correctly – it was not and is not anti-business.

Submitted by
Shereen Bailey on behalf of
Durbin Town Government

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Enter your email address to weekly notifications.

You will receive a confirmation email for your subscription. Please check your inbox and spam folder to complete the confirmation process.
Some fields are missing or incorrect!
Lists
Previous Post

Legal Advertisements – April 15, 2021

Next Post

Circuit Court

Next Post

Ruth Simmons

ADVERTISEMENT
  • National News
  • State News
  • Contact Us
Call us: 304-799-4973

  • Login
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.
body::-webkit-scrollbar { width: 7px; } body::-webkit-scrollbar-track { border-radius: 10px; background: #f0f0f0; } body::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { border-radius: 50px; background: #dfdbdb }
No Result
View All Result
  • News Sections
    • Local
    • Sports
    • A&E
  • Obituaries
  • Community
  • Magistrate News
    • Circuit Court News
  • Compass
  • Spiritual
    • Parabola
    • Transcendental Meditation
    • Diocese of Wheeling-Charleston
    • Southern Baptist
  • Pocahontas County Veterans
  • etimes
  • Classifieds
  • Login
  • FAQ