Dear Editor,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed expansion of cell service within the National Radio Quiet Zone (NRQZ). This unique area, established in 1958, is not just a quiet space for radio astronomy; it is a sanctuary for many individuals, including those who are electrosensitive and have sought refuge here from the pervasive electromagnetic fields found in more urban areas.
The NRQZ is a vital asset to our community, playing an essential role in both scientific research and national security. Any changes that compromise its integrity could have far-reaching consequences, not just for our local environment but for scientific endeavors that rely on the clarity of radio signals. The safety concerns raised by the proponents of increased signal coverage are often framed in alarming terms, yet it’s crucial to recognize that it appears the term “safety” is being leveraged to advance the interests of commercial endeavors, including telecommunications companies, rather than genuinely addressing our community’s needs.
While I understand the importance of emergency communications, the push to prioritize cell towers is misguided. As your article suggests, studies suggest that lower frequency radio communications could better serve our emergency needs without introducing harmful EMF levels into an already sensitive environment. Pocahontas County is unique, as it is one of the very few remaining areas in the world where people don’t have their heads bowed down looking into their phones 24/7. It is still a place where neighbors talk to each other and kids play outside. This is a very unique setting, and it should not become like the rest of the country.
It is concerning to see local officials supporting resolutions that undermine the very regulations designed to protect our community. We must ask ourselves: are we willing to sacrifice the unique qualities of Pocahontas County for short-term economic gain and a perceived sense of safety, or are we committed to preserving what makes our county unique?
Let us advocate for thoughtful, sustainable solutions that respect the NRQZ’s purpose. Instead of yielding to the pressures of telecommunications companies, we should stand firm in our commitment to protect this irreplaceable resource. The future of our community depends on it.
Sincerely,
Miriam Weber
Green Bank